Drone near miss over Poland


A commercial airliner narrowly missed hitting a drone at 2500 feet while coming into land at Warsaw International Airport in Poland.

The Lufthansa Embraer ERJ-195 was flying from Munich, Germany, and was on final approach when the crew reported they had just avoided hitting a drone, missing it by 100 metres.

As The Aviation Herald reported on Monday, the flight crew criticised Warsaw’s air traffic control (ATC), stating that they ‘should take care of your airspace’ and that ‘it is really dangerous’.

Despite the near miss, the Embraer landed safely a few minutes later.

In Australia, there are strict rules for the flight of remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) aimed at protecting those in the air as well as those on the ground.

Despite these safety rules, a number of recent incidents near Merimbula Airport on the NSW South Coast has forced the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue a specific warning for the area, reminding drone operators to keep well away of aircraft operating in and out of the airport.

There are other safety regulations surrounding recreational flight of RPAs that are detailed in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations (CASR) subparts 101.

Although these rules are currently under review, they include:

  • You must only operate the aircraft in your line-of-sight in daylight. Don’t let it get too far away from you.
  • You must not fly closer than 30 metres to vehicles, boats, buildings or people.
  • You must not fly over any populous area, such as beaches, other people’s backyards, heavily populated parks, or sports ovals where there is a game in progress.
  • If you are in controlled airspace — which covers most Australian cities — you must not fly higher than 400 feet (120 metres).
  • You should not fly within 5.5 km of an airfield.

You can also download this safety information in the form of a pamphlet from CASA’s website.

Drone near misses continue to make headlines around the world with Flight Safety Australia recently reporting that fire fighting aircraft in California were grounded after a drone, thought to be flown by a hobbyist, was seen flying in close proximity.


  1. What are the advantages and weight & power source penalties for commercial UAV’s, UAS’s, Drones to be fitted with operating Transponders Mode C or S? Would this positively allow ATC and similar Transponder fitted aircraft situational awareness as well as being able to identify the owner/operator?
    I understanding the cost implications to drone operators but the risk of collision with airborne and terrestrial objects is rising without check and raises questions as to whether nano-sized transponder equipment be mandatory for all drones above a certain weight category – inclusive of private recreational and commercial used drones. Anyone know where FAA, EASA, CASA are sensibly going with protective electronic safety nets for all airspace users so that drones and manned vehicles can co-exist? What are the operational rules and aspects to weather and research balloons released in and about defined airspaces?
    As it always goes, its always fun until someone gets hurt and the tears start…


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here